principles are principles

In the past few weeks, I’ve run into two presentations that relied on Chickering and Gamson’s “Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education.” I suppose that you’re not surprised, given the title, but you might be surprised to know that the article that introduced these principles was first published in the dark ages of 1987. If you were all caught up in the big hair, bigger shoulder pads of that era and missed the article, here are the big 7:

  1. encourages contact between students and faculty,
  2. develops reciprocity and cooperation among students,
  3. encourages active learning,
  4. gives prompt feedback,
  5. emphasizes time on task,
  6. communicates high expectations, and
  7. respects diverse talents and ways of learning.

I’m sure you’ll agree that these really are still good principles. But maybe you’ll be surprised to know that I heard them referenced in presentations about education and technology. In late May, I heard Steve Gilbert of the TLT Group speak at Gannon’s symposium on teaching, and his entire presentation focused on how technology can enhance these principles. You can find Gilbert’s resources here.

Then I heard about them again at the Second Life Best Practices in Education 2007 conference from Sarah Robbins (Intellagirl Tully, SL) in her presentation on “Engagement in Second Life.” You can view a clip of her presentation here, and find her slides and download them here.

Maybe I should remind you more often that using technology is not a substitute for thinking about your course design. There’s nothing worse than being presented with dazzling gizmos that are expected to speak for themselves–why are you in the classroom or online with your students if that’s the case?

Isn’t it great to allay fears that the teacher isn’t needed anymore?

P.S. I guess I’ll have to cross-post this on our new SL blog, since I mentioned it;)


Categories: communication, pedagogy

Tags: , , ,

3 replies

  1. Thank you very much for this info.


    Did you listen to todays blog posting? This is really interesting.


  3. Even if the teacher is not needed in the physical sense, it takes a teacher to design/re-design and monitor/assess learning in the virtual sense.

    And regarding gizmos sans craft, how would you like a plumber to show up at your house with all of the latest tools, show you how they work, and then leave with your pipes still leaking? Students feel this way when technology is substituted for effective teaching craft.


%d bloggers like this: